【导语】“MIKITA”通过精心收集，向本站投稿了7篇考研英语 用阅读练考研写作，下面是小编为大家整理后的考研英语 用阅读练考研写作，以供大家参考借鉴!
- 目录
篇1：考研英语 用阅读练考研写作
考研英语 用阅读练考研写作
暑假班开始了，上课一贯强调的一点就是要向最好的老师学习英文，而不是被一些乱七八糟歪瓜裂枣的模板或者表达弄得混沌不堪。就写作这个范畴，相对应的阅读文章顺理成章地成为了最好的老师。不过听到这个话的人众多，但是真正有触动，并且把触动变为行动的'甚少。所以张老师和你们一起，手把手地以考研阅读为例，做一个系列的简要分析和分享。
【认知】
今天我们看到的是考研阅读英语(一)的第一篇阅读理解。这里摘取的是第一段。
The decision of the New York Philharmonic to hire Alan Gilbert as its next music director has been the talk of the classical-music world ever since the sudden announcement of his appointment in 2009. For the most part, the response has been favorable, to say the least. “Hooray! At last!” wrote Anthony Tommasini, a sober-sided classical-music critic.
这里我们很快划分一下第一句的成分，就能轻松地总结出第一句的句型结构，然后进行仿写了。
The decision (of the New York Philharmonic) (to hire Alan Gilbert as its next music director) has been the talk of the classical-music world ever since the sudden announcement of his appointment in 2009. For the most part, the response has been favorable, to say the least. “Hooray! At last!” wrote Anthony Tommasini, a sober-sided classical-music critic.
【解析】
我们很容易看到，同样是讲到成为热点话题，用到了talk，类似于我们原来接触过的焦点“attention”或者“focus”等的表达。当然，xx has been the talk也基本类似于xx has become the heated topic或者xx has been under heated discussion或者xx has become the public attention或者xx has become the focus of differnet social groups。
值得学习的是，我们原来写完这一句就结束了，后面的时间ever since加上名词，表达相应的时间或者状态，可以很好地延展句型，同时也可以将套话和具体事件结合起来。还有一点需要注意，就是decision后面的两个修饰，一个是关于要做某事，一个是关于decision的发出者，这些都是使得句子变得相对复杂的包装。
【应用】
如果要写姚明退役这个话题，句子可以先从最简单的开始练习。
The decision has been the talk of the basketball world.
The decision of Yao Ming has been the talk of the basketball world.
The decision of Yao Ming to quit NBA has been the talk of the basketball world.
The decision of Yao Ming to quit NBA has been the talk of the basketball world ever since the sudden announcement of his leaving last week.
【变通】
大学网才研频道。篇2：考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作
2012考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作
【认知】今天我们选取的是第一篇文章，原文如下：
We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turns of the 20th century and the eve of World War Ⅱ, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism, ”Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are’. ”
【解析】
在这一段当中，字数已经达到了171个字，同学们在写作文的时候，肯定没有必要写那么多，不过正如上课所讲的，如果你要练习一千米长跑，我们平时训练的时候一般都会多跑几百米，所以，如果这里字数超出考研作文要求，那是因为文章整体字数也超出了很多，所以按照适当比例，我们可以推断出，如果文章写5段，4段，3段，分别每段在多少字为宜，这里不赘述。除了句型，今天要解析的重点就是背景介绍的逻辑和模式，这也是我们十种论证方式当中的第四种(关于数据逻辑的方式大家可以去微博看相关视频，上课有讲到)。
We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews(这一段的主题句，反复应征上一段的.观点) published in England between the turns of the 20th century and the eve of World War Ⅱ, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days(老外的从宏观到微观的论证方式，和google earth很像), it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business(相对于前面一句，这一句更加的细化), and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men(顺承前句) believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism, ”Newman wrote(再进一步细化), “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are’. ”‘
所以，整个段落的背景介绍思路和模式是：
二战到20世纪的报刊评论(大环境)――报刊杂志的评论量足细节更足(行业)――评论家(如同消磨那和纽曼)对周围实事了如指掌(行业人群体)――这些评论家喜欢在上面发表文章(行业人群)――其中一位(纽曼)的话(行业人个例)。
从微观的角度分析句子，相对来说，如果有了前面五篇的基础，就比较容易了，尽管句子越来越长，但是难度并不大。
We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turns of the 20th century and the eve of World War Ⅱ, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared.
这个句子的实质就是A，at a time when B and C(a was considered as b 后面加上定语从句)。
顺便说一句啊，在考研写作过程当中，出现太多的we会显得不够客观，所以可以把we换成people。
In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered.
这句主要的语言点在于it was taken for granted that...相当于it was natural that...只是语气更为强烈。
Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about.
两句话中间加逗号加and，相信这个大家不陌生，这里不赘述，只是要注意长短句的结合，哪怕在同一个句子里面，我们都看出了一张一弛，其他的就是定语从句了，然后就是wear their learning lightly大家可以学学，毕竟非常地道，如果不知道意思，可以想想反义wear their learning heavily，穿着学识沉沉的外衣，意思可想而知，反之则相反，“低调”“深藏不露”，“不显山不漏水”，“学究气不浓”，“不好为人师”相信都可以的。从整个文章来说，“即便是像萧伯纳和纽曼这样__________的人也希望在报纸上发表一些评论”，如果是高调或者喜欢炫耀的意思，就不会有even though这个语气在里面。
These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press.
这里要学习的是believe in A as B，其他自便。
“So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism, ”Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are’. ”
一般在考研作文当中，很少出现引语的，所以这里不详细讲，不过大家可以尝试一下在没有中间隔断的情况下，这句话是不是也可以作为仿写的对象，毕竟纽曼还是很有文采的。修改整理后的句子变成了
Few authors have enough brains or enough literary gift to keep their own end up in journalism, so that I am tempted to define 'journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt (applied by writers who are not read to writers who are’).
【应用】
和以往五篇不同，从第六篇开始，我们就已经不再是简单做单句的仿写，而是确定一个统一的主题，然后从模式和模板两个层面，双管齐下。比如讲到选美比赛本身其实并不能让大家真正的接近美。这个主题的大环境是，大家其实从某种意义上已经不在乎什么是美，因为美太主观，在这个大环境下，选美比赛的主办方正是利用了关于美的不确定标准，吸引了眼球，谋求了利益，在这个选美比赛的小环境下，选手们，组织者们，观众们作为行业群体的表现各异，但是目标几乎都不是为了接近美，最后如果愿意的话，可以举出个案，延伸到主办方用商业化毁掉美，观众增加茶余饭后的谈资，以及选手通过整形等方式获得胜利等相关分话题。
We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War Ⅱ, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared.
People are generally farther from the the essence of beauty “advocated” from beauty contests worldwide since the beginning of 21st Century, as a time when the standard of beauty has been diversified, and contests or competitions have been considered as never-failing eye-catchers in which the slogan of pursuing the true beauty constantly talks but seldom walks.
In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered.
In these profit-based days, it is taken for granted that the leaders of related commercial organizations would put financial reward on top priority throught contests they hold.
Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about.
Theirs is a high-profit business, and even though who wear the badge of “the ultimate beauty pursuer”, could be trusted to anticipate the winning of the game.
These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press.
These contestants believed in beauty contests as a shortcut to personal prosperity, and must be proud to be appreciated, admired, or even adored by individuals and groups from various channels.
了解了背景介绍的段落写作手法后，我们慢慢发现，在通往高分作文的路上，模板的威力越来越小，模式的威力显现的越来越大，最关键的是要心知肚明写完上句后，下句应该写什么，就算内容上不明确，
篇3：考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作四
考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作四
上课的时候强调过的，如果同学们对写作一头雾水，首先要训练的两项内功和意识就是有关观点和现象，或者说表象和实质，或者说是具体和抽象，或者说是演绎和归纳，或者说色和空。今天我们着重锻炼这个层面中的一个――各种观点的表达。
【认知】
今天我们的选段来自于考研英语第四篇阅读理解的第一段。大爱这一篇文章的写法，不过由于时间关系，我们还是只呈现其中一段好了。
It’s no surprise that Jennifer Senior’s insightful, provocative magazine cover story, “I love My Children, I Hate My Life,” is arousing much chatter C nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that child rearing is anything less than a completely fulfilling, life-enriching experience. Rather than concluding that children make parents either happy or miserable, Senior suggests we need to redefine happiness: instead of thinking of it as something that can be measured by moment-to-moment joy, we should consider being happy as a past-tense condition. Even though the day-to-day experience of raising kids can be soul-crushingly hard, Senior writes that “the very things that in the moment dampen our moods can later be sources of intense gratification and delight.”
由于整个系列的要求，选段的难度和博文的难度也在不断提升。在面对大量信息需要消化的时候，我们所需要做的首先是化整为零，然后做分类。大家可以结合阅读老师上课教授的技巧进行练习。
【解析】
昨天讲过，在分解的过程当中，我们首先考虑的是大处着眼，从宏观到微观，所以在分析段落的过程当中，我们首先能看到的是段落当中的一些关键字。何为关键字?简而言之，就是你能看懂并且认为重要的字。如果你仍然认为干扰太多，结构太复杂，就去寻找这个文章和段落的观点以及立场。
It’s no surprise that Jennifer Senior’s insightful, provocative magazine cover story, “I love My Children, I Hate My Life,” is arousing much chatter C nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that child rearing is anything less than a completely fulfilling, life-enriching experience. Rather than concluding that children make parents either happy or miserable, Senior suggests we need to redefine happiness: instead of thinking of it as something that can be measured by moment-to-moment joy, we should consider being happy as a past-tense condition. Even though the day-to-day experience of raising kids can be soul-crushingly hard, Senior writes that “the very things that in the moment dampen our moods can later be sources of intense gratification and delight.”
(一)
第一句话里面it is no surprise只是作为一个语气类的引入，对句子的正负没有任何影响。于是主干出现了cover story is arousing much chatter。后面的破折号一般表示解释，所以可以暂时不看。大概意思大家应该明白，就是引起了讨论，只是chatter在这里不是那么正面的色彩，所以翻译成“口水仗”。绿色的.rather than后面可以略过，看逗号后红色的部分，我们大概明白了这个story的作者的态度--我们应该重新定义幸福或快乐。冒号后面是解释，可以暂时不看。如果硬要看，可以看红色的部分。看到Even though，知道重点在后面，于是挑出主干，红色的部分大家可以尝试阅读。
整个段落的大致结构已经出现：
1 故事引发讨论+解释
2 反观点+正观点(注意：这里不是罗列反观点，而是用反观点衬托作者Senior的正观点)
3 进一步细化反观点的衬托+进一步细化正观点
这个是正反观点的一种写法变体，大家好好模仿吧。恳请各位同学不要再写some people believe...others believe...I believe...了……求你们了!中国烂模板害死人不偿命啊!
(二)
我们来看看具体的句子，结合我们前面所提到的相关句型仿写的写法，我们逐一分析。
It is no surprising that xx is arousing much chatter.
除了用it is no surprsing that...后面接一个观点或者现象，还可以用it is not uncommong/unusual等相关的写法。这个句子比较简单，所以不赘述了。
nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that child rearing is anything less than a completely fulfilling, life-enriching experience.
我们看到另一种表达最高级的方式，如同nobody moved so fast like he did. 大家很容易看出来，意思就是he moved faster than anyone else. 所以这个句子中the suggestion加上后面的同位语从句，成了使得大家热烈讨论的导火线。用这样的方式写句子，除了更好的表达最高级，还可以在结尾的名词处多出一个同位语从句，一举两得的。
在看句子里面，A is anything less than B，如果不熟悉anything less than就是by no means或者not at all的意思，我们可以推理出，anything就是任何事物，less than是小于号，也就是倾其所有也达不到的感觉，自然是否定的。顺便提一下，两个形容词修饰名词的情况，这个上课讲过，但是这里，出现了副词修饰形容词A，加上合成形容词B的方法。如果暂时学不会，可以不用勉强。
Rather than concluding that children make parents either happy or miserable, Senior suggests we need to redefine happiness
rather than doing A, 加上主句。这个仿写比较容易，注意一下suggest和前文的suggestion，都是揭示，暗示的意思，具体的原因可以通过后面句子的时态看出。
instead of thinking of it as something that can be measured by moment-to-moment joy, we should consider being happy as a past-tense condition
再次强调，instead of 不要理解为“代替”，求你们了，它的本质含义就和rather than类似，理解成“而不是”。可怜的同学们肯定是因为背了单词书的英文和中文直接对应，忽略了它的语境，再次大声疾呼，一个词汇和短语的意思要在句子中才能体现出真正含义啊!!对了，注意Instead of doing A，后年有定语从句，这样也就不会和前面的rather than显得重复。这就是有变化的重复的另外一种变体，绝对不是只把important换成significant那么简单。
Even though the day-to-day experience of raising kids can be soul-crushingly hard, Senior writes that “the very things that in the moment dampen our moods can later be sources of intense gratification and delight.”
简单的让步状语从句，即使……也……稍微注意一下那个hard前面的合成副词，大家应该还记得我上课说过，能把副词用到极致的人，是高手，这里的soul-crushingly hard就是很好的例证，不过我忍不住问一句，为什么这里的hard不变成difficult呢?
【应用】
我们来简单做一个个句子的仿写。
It is no surprising that xx is arousing much chatter.
最近高铁出事比较多，it is no suprsing that the breakdown of the High Speed Train is arousing much chatter.
nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that child rearing is anything less than a completely fulfilling, life-enriching experience.
飞机误点，火车遇到泥石流，大巴事故，私家车堵车等各种交通工具的话题都没有这一次让大家讨论得那么热烈，坐高铁的人你伤不起啊!(此处省略各种尼玛有木有坑爹等一万字)。nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that High Speed Train jouney is anything less than a completely exicitng and joy-drilling experience.
Rather than concluding that children make parents either happy or miserable, Senior suggests we need to redefine happiness
平常的讨论局限于利弊之争(中国人写文章的时候很容易作出利大于弊或者弊大于利的大讨论，似乎所有的利弊都可以衡量一样)，这次人们没有这么做，逐渐变得客观理性的人们觉得我们应该重新开始考虑问题的根源。Rather than following the traditional debate upon the advantages and disvantages upon taking the train(也可以用pros and cons)，people with greater r
篇4：考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作三
考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作三
在挑选考研阅读中佳句的过程当中，大家如果拿捏不了标准，可以按照上课所讲过的知识点进行搜寻和对应，久而久之，就会形成一种感觉和习惯，就是随便看到一个句子，本能就能看出它的语言点在哪里。还有一个地方值得和他家分享，那就是我们需要关注的是，同一个意思，作者和我们表达的差异。首先了解差异what，再探究动机why，最后模仿手法how。这个what why how原则不仅仅是指导我们议论文写作的明灯，同样也是规范我们做事思维模式的入门级套路。好的，我们来看今天的内容。
【认知】
今天选择的是20考研阅读的第三篇的第三段。
The same dramatic technological changes that have provided marketers with more (and more diverse) communications choices have also increased the risk that passionate consumers will voice their opinions in quicker, more visible, and much more damaging ways. Such hijacked media are the opposite of earned media: an asset or campaign becomes hostage to consumers, other stakeholders, or activists who make negative allegations about a brand or product. Members of social networks, for instance, are learning that they can hijack media to apply pressure on the businesses that originally created them.
【解析】
我们今天只分析第一句，当一句话当中的语言点比较多的时候，我们采取的是从宏观到微观的方式，这样的话，不会漏掉语言点，也不会显得凌乱。每个复杂句子的构成就和我们做图画一样，是一层一层坐上去的，所以读的时候自然需要耐心，不能操之过急。不过分解的过程如果比较慢，合成的过程就会比较快了。道理和上下坡是一样的，能量守恒，RP守恒，whatever you name it.
The same dramatic technological changes that have provided marketers with more (and more diverse) communications choices have also increased the risk that passionate consumers will voice their opinions in quicker, more visible, and much more damaging ways.
在读到这个句子的时候，同学们的第一步应该是梳理主干，所以主谓宾应该是第一位的。顺便提及一下，有同学写信来问到，在听力的时候如何很好地区分主干，答案是：一般主语后面有从句或者修饰成分，在念的过程当中，会在成分和从句结束之后以及谓语动词到来之前有停顿，尽管不是所有的停顿后面都是谓语动词，不过既然知道了停顿的特点，找起来就容易很多了。我们来看这一句。
The same dramatic technological changes that have provided marketers with more (and more diverse) communications choices have also increased the risk that passionate consumers will voice their opinions in quicker, more visible, and much more damaging ways.
相信，如果是the same dramatic technological changes have also increased the risk这样对的句子没有同学会觉得痛苦的(当然，如果非常吃力，可以把句子再缩略呈the changes have also increased the risk)，同学们很容易就联想到了，在不用从句修饰的情况下，句型升级的方法也仍然有很多，其中第一种我上课讲到的就是名词动词形容词前后的修饰，这里无疑，在changes的前面加上了technological表示属性，dramatic表示规模，初中的.时候好像学过一个语法，关于名词前面一连串的形容词应该怎么排序，大家不用特别担心，一般写作的时候，能够在同一个名词前面加上三个形容词就已经是极品了，加上5个以上的就属于极品中的极品。所以我们不必担心，只需要比较几个形容词谁更接近名词的内涵就好。这里值得一提的是dramatic，很多人一谈到变化就用到great，然后经过老师指正后，会用到tremendous 或者enormous。后来又背过一个和dramatic很形近的单词drastic。这些词语当中，只有dramatic最为鲜活的体现出了像电视剧电影一般的变化。几十年前我们认为神仙能够做到的天眼通天耳通等神通，或者认为只能出现在电视剧电影当中的变化，在现今的科技下，几乎都能够实现。所以这个词，往深了去，就是我们所说的画面感生动形象和贴切的意境，往浅了讲，也是高频语言习惯。
The same dramatic technological changes that have provided marketers with more (and more diverse) communications choices have also increased the risk that passionate consumers will voice their opinions in quicker, more visible, and much more damaging ways.
定语从句我上课讲的很清楚了，这里就不赘述，至于为什么要在more后面加上括号，我简单说一下。去掉括号就发现变成了more and more diverse communications chloices，很容易理解为“越来越多”多元化的选择，而作者的意思是更多数量且类型的选择，所以为了区分开，就用了括号。
后面的同位语从句，这个是上课讲过的，上一篇讲过的不要随便去自己造，我们可以通过复述和仿写的方式，慢慢增强同位语从句在我们语言习惯当中的分量，久而久之，自然就会写出地道的句子。从句当中首先要提到的是VOICE their opinion(关于passionate在这里的用法，暂时不讲，因为需要更高的功力才能写出这样的形容词修饰consumers)。典型的名词动词化加上小词妙用，想想我们说“表达观点”时，一般会怎么说?show one's opinion, express one's opionion, present one's opinion?小词的画面感和冲击力是不同凡响的。再看后面的in xxxx ways。上课讲的是in a .....way或者in a ....manner/fashion(其实大家一定能够超越这个句子的，因为你们可以写出in such a manner that……只是这句里面已经有一个从句了，再套从句会显得冗长)。再来看三个形容词，都是用的比较级，但是明显看得出，在文法上想体现出我们上课时候所讲的并列递进结构，而三个里面明显最核心的是最后那一个。顺便说一下，传说老外和中国人不一样，中国人喜欢压轴，把最核心的放在最后面，老外喜欢开门见山，有话直说。其实真的是我们很大程度上的误读。充其量也就是老外喜欢从宏观慢慢进入核心(google earth搜索模式)，而中国人喜欢螺旋式(其实，也是慢慢进入核心，只是在螺旋的过程中看到的景象，会让人觉得有些缺乏显性逻辑联系。)
【应用】
刚才说过了，如果解读起来比较痛苦，那么整合起来比较容易的，我们首先要做的就是仿写主句。而变化无处不在，而任何变化都有风险，更何况是如此巨大的变化。所以基本上这个句子不用怎么变。The same dramatic technological changes have also increased the risk. 下一步要做的就是什么样的风险，比如年轻人被这些变化从现实生活当中异化，句子变成The same dramatic technological changes have also increased the risk that teenagers have been pulled away from real life in quicker, more visible and much more direct ways. 后面可以再写三个例子，证明如何快速，如何显性，如何直接。
关于加入定语从句，应该不难了，事实上也是给他们更多的选择导致的结果，所以可以照抄就好。
【变通】
真正的难点在这里，上课时候讲过，如果你可以让别人随便说一个话题或者一句话，然后轻易地用指定的句型结构表达出来，就算是学有所成了。这里我来出题，大家可以尝试写写，只要和“荣誉”有关的句子就行。提示：先按照句子的主干造出主谓宾，然后写成英文，然后再添加相关成分进行修改。PS：所有的中国人(在国外生长大的孩子和四岁半以前去国外的孩子除外)学外语的过程当中，都必经这个翻译过程，也就是中文转换成英文过程，只是有的人速度很快，我们看不出来。还是那句话，不是他比你牛，是他比你熟。大家加油。
大学网考研频道.篇5：考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作二
考研英语指导 用阅读练考研写作二
上课的时候讲到过，好的作文要做到的三要素就是思想、结构、语言。在挖掘考研阅读文章的语言点时，也需要注意这点。这里选择的语料比较典型的符合以上的标准，大家如果自身觉得迷茫的话，可以先好好学习这里的素材。
【认知】
今天我们看到的是考研阅读英语(一)的第二篇阅读理解。这里摘取的是第三段。
The decision to quit a senior position to look for a better one is unconventional. For years executives and headhunters have adhered to the rule that the most attractive CEO candidates are the ones who must be poached. Says Korn/Ferry senior partner Dennis Carey:”I can’t think of a single search I’ve done where a board has not instructed me to look at sitting CEOs first.
这里我们做一个简要的分析，和昨天不同，今天的这里的语言点不是单一的，值得借鉴的地方也较多，所以如果觉得吃力的同学，可以先读昨天那篇文章。
The decision (to quit a senior position to look for a better one) is unconventional. For years executives and headhunters have adhered to the rule that the most attractive CEO candidates are the ones who must be poached. Says Korn/Ferry senior partner Dennis Carey:”I can’t think of a single search I’ve done where a board has not instructed me to look at sitting CEOs first.”
【解析】
1
A 我们又一次看到了和昨天一样亲切的the decision to do sth的表达，呵呵，不知道是不是巧合?亦或者是不同作者相同的写作思维模式?值得一提的是，今天的语言点里面变成了the decision to do A to do B，里面涉及到了决定的目的，已经这个目的背后的目的，这个可以称之为二次推理。除了在语言点上给我们启发以外，更多的是希望提醒大家，我们做事情的时候，要有进一步思考的意识，在分析别人的动机的背后，也许还需要分析更深一层的动机。如同决定考研的同学的动机绝对不是因为别人都考研了所以你也考研，需要更深层次的思考，当然，也不能出现这样的循环，考研是为了有个好工作，有个好工作是为了有个好家庭，然后生个好孩子，再让他考研。
B 还有一点需要注意，就是那个unconvertional，是同学们一般不会想到要用的词汇。这一句就是我们上课时候所讲的Topic sentence.
2
A 这句话就是我们上课时候所讲到的developing sentence。它的目的是支撑和解释第一句话的， 为什么这个人的决定是不合常理的?因为这么多年了猎头找的CEO都是在任的，而不是请辞的那些人。虽然这里没有用到大家老生常谈的becasue, as, for，但是仍然是有个因果联系的(特别提醒，句首的for，是和years连接在一起的，表示很多年了，不是表达原因的连词啊)。
B 大家应该能够读懂adhere to the rules是什么意思，一边拿我们会在rules前面加上不成文的规定--unwritten rules或者看不见的规则hidden rules，后面的that后面就是我们常说的同位语从句，上课时候说过，不要自己坐在那里想同位语从句，阅读文章里面多的是，随便拈一个考试就够用了。这个句子应该比较好仿写吧，毕竟我们遵循的规则还是很多的。
C 大家可以想想看，这里为什么不直接说the most attractive CEOs must be poached而非要用the most attractive CEOs are the ooes who...这样讲话或者行文可以达到先引起对方的'注意，然后再说重点内容，信息能够有效传递的效果，比如中文讲：“天气预报是这样一档节目。”听众的注意力会被提起来，并且猜想后文，然后再给出下文，“一直以来它都竭尽全力说真话，但是尝试一次，就几乎失败一次。”这样的处理，听众或者读者满足了预期，说话者或者笔者收获了关注。
3
A 这个虽然是引语，不过在这个段落里面，充当了例证的角色，完全符合我们课堂上面所讲授的观点句，支撑句，例证的写法结构。稍微注意一下这个双重否定(注意我上课讲过的双重否定的功效绝对不是加强语气，而是为了展示炫技，当然在阅读理解里面，它还有一个绕晕考生的功效)。
B 值得注意的是，在考研作文当中，我们一般少用i,所以，这个地方的i can't think of。。。可以改成客观的评述，比如 it would be wildly impossible to think of 等。
c 在a single search的后面出现了两个定于从句，一个是修饰search的特征，一个是描述search里面的内涵，那个where自然等于in which。
【应用】
思想：给出观点，分析原因，给出事例。
结构：重新审视这些句型结构。
1 the decision to do A to do B is adj
2 For years sb have adhered to the rule that 同位语从句(包含sb are the ones who)
3 it would be wildly impossible to think of a single case/example +定于从句1+where引导的定语从句2(注意从句里面还有一个否定)
语言：
1 比尔盖兹从哈佛辍学为了实现自己的梦想，这个决定的确不寻常。
The decision of Bill Gates to quit Harward to realize his dream is indeed unconventional.
2 因为这么多年了，大众遵循的规则就是，成功的人应该是那些把自己的天分基于良好的教育背景之上的人。
For years the general public has adhered to the unwritten rule that the most success people are the ones who build their gifts and specialties upon lucrative education.
3 在报刊杂志当中，几乎不可能看到这样的例子，某行业领军人物没有完成自己的大学本科教育。
It would be wildly impossible to figure out a single case (that prevails in newspapers and magzines) where the leader of a certain area has not finished his college education.
【变通】
只要是观点，就一定能够推理出前因后果，只要是观点，就能够找到适当的例子，大家可以尝试2011年考研涉及到旅游和环境的话题，给出自己的观点，然后分析原因，然后给出一个新的事例。
大学网考研频道.篇6：考研英一阅读真题
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain's National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It Is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients In 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients' rights and their expectations of privacy.
DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements- and there may be many-between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed“ it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that dugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham's report is a welcome start.
31.Wha is true of the agreement between the NHS and DeepMind ?
[A] It caused conflicts among tech giants.
[B] It failed to pay due attention to patient’s rights.
[C] It fell short of the latter's expectations
[D] It put both sides into a dangerous situation.
32. The NHS trust responded to Denham's verdict with
[A] empty promises.
[B] tough resistance.
[C] necessary adjustments.
[D] sincere apologies.
33.The author argues in Paragraph 2 that
[A] privacy protection must be secured at all costs.
[B] leaking patients' data is worse than selling it.
[C] making profits from patients' data is illegal.
[D] the value of data comes from the processing of it
34.According to the last paragraph, the real worry arising from this deal is
[A] the vicious rivalry among big pharmas.
[B] the ineffective enforcement of privacy law.
[C] the uncontrolled use of new software.
[D] the monopoly of big data by tech giants.
35.The author's attitude toward the application of AI to healthcare is
[A] ambiguous.
[B] cautious.
[C] appreciative.
[D] contemptuous.
篇7：考研英一阅读真题
The journal Science is adding an extra source at Peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNott announced today. The Follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that Mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the Published research findings.
”Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,“writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the Journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the Journal's editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these
Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said,”The creation of the'statistics board'was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science's overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.“
Giovanni Parmigiani，a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group, says he expects the board to ”play primarily on advisory role.“ He agreed to join because he ”found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.“
John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is ”a most welcome step forward“and ”long overdue,“”Most journals are weak in statistical review，and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,“he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.
Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research，according to David Vaux，a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012，but journals should also take a tougher line，”engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process.“Vaux says that Science's idea to pass some papers to statisticians ”has some merit，but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify'the papers that need scrutiny'in the first place.“
31. It can be learned from Paragraph I that
[A] Science intends to simplify its peer-review process.
[B]journals are strengthening their statistical checks.
[C]few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.
[D]lack of data analysis is common in research projects.
32. The phrase ”flagged up \"(Para.2)is the closest in meaning to
[A]found.
[B]revised.
[C]marked
[D]stored
33. Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may
[A]pose a threat to all its peers
[B]meet with strong opposition
[C]increase Science's circulation.
[D]set an example for other journals
34. David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now
A. adds to researchers' worklosd.
B. diminishes the role of reviewers.
C. has room for further improvement.
D. is to fail in the foreseeable future.
35. Which of the following is the best title of the text?
A. Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers
B. Professional Statisticians Deserve More Respect
C. Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors' Desks
D. Statisticians Are Coming Back with Science
★ 考研英语 写作中
★ 考研范文
考研英语 用阅读练考研写作（推荐7篇）
