【导语】“好好活下去”通过精心收集，向本站投稿了8篇用写作评分标准教你如何备考写作，下面是小编帮大家整理后的用写作评分标准教你如何备考写作，希望对大家有所帮助。
- 目录
篇1：用写作评分标准教你如何备考写作
实用雅思写作提升攻略丨用写作评分标准教你如何备考写作
一. 雅思写作评分标准对语法的要求
我们在上文中说到的雅思写作评分标准的最后一项是Grammatical Range & Accuracy，这是什么意思呢?先来说Grammatical Range，也就是语法应用的宽泛度，也就是我们通常说的语法使用的多样性，另外一个Grammatical Accuracy很好理解，就是语法的准确性。那么针对这样的要求应该如何备考呢?小站雅思君建议大家系统地学习一本语法教材，初级语法书够用，中级语法书更好。系统学习完成以后还不够，这只是达到了解的程度。想要达到准确运用的境界还要练习。练习是不能拿写作来直接练的，建议先练语法题确保语法知识完全掌握，然后再尝试在写作中运用各种语法。
二. 雅思写作评分标准对词汇的要求
雅思写作评分标准第三点是Lexical Resource。这个评分标准也不用过多解释，就是考察大家的词汇量和对词汇的运用。针对这个评分标准应该如何备考呢?首先是扩充词汇量。写作词汇和阅读听力对于词汇的掌握要求不同，听力只要听音知意即可，阅读只要看到认识即可，但是写作涉及的词汇不但要认识，还要掌握用法，能够熟练运用。那么什么样的词汇是我们所熟知的呢?打个比方，当我们要去形容一个漂亮杯子的时候，我们在脑海中会浮现出诸如beautiful、nice等词汇，但是却想不到delicate、gorgeous等词汇，虽然这两个词一看到也都认识。那么beautiful、nice就属于我们我们能拿出来应用的词汇范畴，而delicate、gorgeous则属于看到认识系列。大家要到这一点要求就要扩充自己能够熟练运用的词汇，这样在写作中才能拓宽用词范围。
三. 雅思写作评分标准对结构的要求
我们在第一段中说到的雅思写作评分标准Coherence and Cohesion指的是文章的连贯和衔接。如何达到这一标准呢?大家要在写作中注意文章的结构和逻辑。如何将一篇文章很好地串联地一起?如何能让自己文章的逻辑性更强?小站雅思君建议大家在平时写作的时候注意一下文章的结构，多积累逻辑词。可以参看一些写作范文，学习文章结构和逻辑，积累写作方法和对逻辑词的运用。
四. 雅思写作评分标准对审题的要求
最后，我来说说上文中提到的雅思写作评分标准的第一点：Task Response。这个评分标准的意思是对写作任务的回应。如何才能有效回应写作任务?首先一点是切题。雅思写作分为大小两篇作文，小作文多是图表题，此时要做到切题只需要找到关键信息，清晰阐述即可;大作文要求考生根据某一个话题阐述自己的观点，此时要做到切题必需审清题目再下笔，建议先审题再列提纲再写作。
雅思写作常见的语法错误归类
一、不一致
所谓不一致不光指主谓不一致，还包括了数的不一致、时态不一致以及代词不一致等。比如：When one have money, he can do what he want to.
分析：one是第三人称单数，因此本句的have应改为has; want应改为wants, 本句是典型的主谓不一致。
改为：When one has money, he can do what he wants (to do).
二、修饰语错位
英语与汉语不同，同一个修饰语置于句子不同的位置，句子的含义可能引起变化。对于这一点考生们往往没有引起足够的重视，因而造成了不必要的误解。比如：I believe I can do it well and I will better know the world outside the campus.
分析：better位置不当，应置于句末。
三、句子不完整
在口语中，交际双方可借助手势语气上下文等，不完整的句子完全可以被理解。可是书面语就不同了，句子结构不完整会令意思表达不清，这种情况常常在主句写完以后，作者又想加些补充说明时发生。比如：There are many ways to know the society. For example by TV, radio, newspaper and so on.
分析：本句后半部分“For example by TV, radio, newspaper and so on.”不是一个完整的句子，仅为一些不连贯的词语，不能独立成句。
改为：There are many ways to know society, for example, by TV, radio, and newspaper.
四、悬垂修饰语
所谓悬垂修饰语是指句首的短语与后面句子的逻辑关系混乱不清。比如：At the age of ten, my grandfather died. 这句中”at the age of ten“只写出十岁时，但没有说明“谁”十岁时，按一般推理不可能是my grandfather, 如果我们把这个悬垂修饰语改得明确一点，读者或考官在读句子时就不会误解了。
改为：When I was ten, my grandfather died.
五、词性误用
“词性误用”常表现为：介词当动词用;形容词当副词用;名词当动词用等。比如：None can negative the importance of money.
分析：negative系形容词，误作动词。
改为：None can deny the importance of money.
六、指代不清
指代不清主要讲的是代词与被指代的人或物关系不清，或者先后所用的代词不一致。比如：Mary was friendly to my sister because she wanted her to be her bridesmaid.
读完上面这一句话，读者无法明确地判断两位姑娘中谁将结婚，谁将当伴娘。如果我们把易于引起误解的代词所指代的对象加以明确，意思就一目了然了。这个句子可改为：Mary was friendly to my sister because she wanted my sister to be her bridesmaid.
七、不间断句子
这个错误的出现受中文意识的影响很大。很多考生在写句子时，句子之间缺乏有效的连接成分。甚至，有的句子写的比较中式化。比如：There are many ways we get to know the outside world.
分析：这个句子包含了两层完整的意思：“there are many ways”以及“we get to know the outside world”。简单地把它们连在一起就不妥当了。
改为：There are many ways for us to learn about the outside world. 或：There are many ways through which we can become acquainted with the outside world.
八、措词毛病
学生在写作中没有养成良好的推敲，斟酌句子中所选用词的习惯。大部分考生随心所欲，拿来就用，所以作文中用词不当的错误随处可见。比如：The increasing use of chemical obstacles in agriculture also makes pollution.
分析：显然，考生把obstacles“障碍”，“障碍物”误作substance“物质”了。另外“the increasing use(不断增加的使用)”应改为“abusive use(滥用)”。
改为：The abusive use of chemical substances in agriculture also causes/leads to pollution.
九、累赘
写句子没有一个多余的词;写段落没有一个无必要的句子。能用单词的不用词组;能用词组的不用从句或句子。比如：In spite of the fact that he is lazy, I like him.
本句的“the fact that he is lazy”系同谓语从句，我们按照上述“能用词组的不用从句”可以改为：In spite of his laziness, I like him.
比如：For the people who are diligent and kind, money is just the thing to be used to buy the thing they need.
整个句子可以大大简化为：Diligent people use money only to buy what they need.
十、不连贯
不连贯是指一个句子前言不对后语，或是结构上不畅通，这也是考生常犯的毛病。比如：The fresh water, it is the most important things of the earth.
分析：the fresh water与逗号后的it不连贯，it与things在数方面不一致。
雅思写作必备谚语分析
1. A bad beginning makes a bad ending. 恶其始者必恶其终。
2. A bad bush is better than the open field. 有胜于无。
3. A bad compromise is better than a good lawsuit. 吃亏的和解也比胜诉强。
4. A bad conscience is a snake in one's heart. 做贼心虚。
5. A bad custom is like a good cake, better broken than kept. 坏习惯像鲜馅饼，分食要比保存好。
6. A bad padlock invites a picklock. 开门揖盗。
7. A bad thing never dies. 坏事传千年。
8. A bad workman quarrels with his tools. 拙匠常怨工具差(人笨怨刀钝)。
9. A bargain is a bargain. 达成的协议不可撕毁。
10. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. 双鸟在林不如一鸟在手。
11. A beggar's purse is bottomless. 乞丐的钱袋是无底洞。
12. A bird is known by its note, and a man by his talk. 闻其歌知其鸟，听其言知其人。
13. A bird may be known by its song. 什么鸟唱什么歌。
14. A bit in the morning is better than nothing all day. 略有胜于全无。
15. A blind man who leans against a wall imagines that it's the boundary of the world. 坐井观天。
16. A blind man will not thank you for a looking-glass. 秋波送盲，白费痴情。
17. A book is the same today as it always was and it will never change. 一本好书今天如此，将来也如此，永不改变。
18. A book that remains shut is but a block. 有书闭卷不阅读，无异是一块木头。
19. A borrowed cloak does not keep one warm. 借来的斗篷不暖身。
20. Absence sharpens love, presence strengthens it. 相聚爱益切，离别情更深。
21. A burden of one's choice is not felt. 自己选的担子不嫌重。
22. A burnt child dreads the fire. 一朝被蛇咬，十年怕井绳。
23. A candle lights others and consumes itself. 蜡烛焚自身，光亮照别人。
24. A cat may look at a king. 猫也有权晋见国王。
25. A cat has nine lives. 猫有九条命。
英语写作
篇2：托福独立写作评分标准及备考策略
阅卷人会从以下4个方面来评估托福独立写作的分数;
1.是否切题：考生不能跑题，答非所问;
2.展开论点：考生一定要提供足够的事例，细节，理由来支持观点;不要仅为了增加文章字数而堆砌冗长无意义的词或句子，却没有针对论点展开论述;
3.文章结构：如果一篇文章能够展现统一，渐进和连贯，读者就能毫无障碍地流畅的阅读;避免逻辑断层，累赘，离题偏题和条理不清晰的衔接，这些都会造成阅读障碍，影响得分。
4.语言运用：如果考生作文句子简单，词汇量有限，没有体现多样性，分数不会超过3分;但是托福写作并不要求学生写fancy words，即高级深奥的词汇;单词，无论难易，准确即可;所以考生也无需故意生搬硬套SAT或GRE单词，一旦使用不当，造成文章晦涩难懂，那就得不偿失了。
篇3：托福独立写作评分标准及备考策略
针对托福独立写作的评分标准我们需要制定一个科学的备考策略，做好计划，按部就班的完成，就能轻松赢取高分。
1.背写作常用短语对于造句子的效果最好，单独记忆单词效果不佳，连接短语和句子，既能快速记忆单词，又可在词汇使用上记忆方法积累素材，可谓一举两得。
2.捋顺写作思路，由点及面，发散思维，以细节支撑观点，这样就能免除无话可说的困境。
3.注意素材的联系使用，我们平时背诵的短语，句子，文章短篇，常常不相关联，但是在组合文章的时候，需要细心巧妙的串联，使之形成支持观点的文章，这样才能事半功倍。
在平时练习托福独立写作的时候，需要坚持4个原则，才能达到更好的训练效果。
1.限时写 2.自己修改 3.专业老师修改 4.总结病句不断提高
提分托福独立写作 需学会找到得分要点
很多托福备考学生在准备托福作文的时候，都忙着在网上大量的找范文和模板。但是，你知道对于托福写作来说，真正的得分点是哪些么?比如：对于想冲刺托福高分的长度保持在300字以上，最好能有400字左右。这些得分的细节你还知道多少呢?下面小编就为大家一一详解。
首先，按照ETS所要求的来说，文章是以论文体(academic)来写，相信这样的写作出发点对于99%的备考学生应该都会知道。而说到文章修辞手法，确实也是托福写作的一个加分法宝。不妨在文章中使用排比、拟人、比喻等修辞手法，甚至引用和倒装这样的方法都会有不错的效果。不过，值得提醒大家的是，使用修辞手法还是需要一定的语法功底的，如果在使用中出现了错误也会适得其反的效果。
其次，在练习托福阅读中，我们都会知道读懂关键句对于全文的理解有着很重要的作用。与之相对应的就是，托福写作过程中关键句也应该在首段观点句、理由段首句和结论段首句中进行表达。同时，建议大家使用一些复杂句的方式，比如倒装句或强调句的对于关键句进行表述。
最后，在托福写作的过程中，想让整篇文章表达的有理有据，学会例证法的使用是非常重要的。建议大家平时多看托福写作题库，并且多思考，将搜集好的一些资料进行分类归纳，做到写作过程中，让例子围绕话题层层展开。
篇4：如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
GRE写作满分要点解析，主要包括以下四点：
1、迎合GRE考试评卷人的评卷思路：
每个评卷人对你文章的评阅非常快，不可能对每个细节都很仔细地去看。考生应该迎合评卷人的评卷思路，用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达来体现自己的思路：首段要鲜明地提出观点，中间段落层次要拉开，每段的开始应该就是该段的topic sentence。
2、熟练掌握新GRE写作题库：
为了达到公平，ETS公布了它考试的所有写作题库，那么为了达到能和native speaker一起竞争，考生应该在考前对所有题目都进行预习(节约考试时的审题时间)，并通过100-150个提纲的写作了解GRE写作的一般结构，通过30-50篇写作来练习自己的写作思路和表达。对题库中的题目越熟练，对考试越有利。
3. 新GRE写作评分注重三方面
首先，从ETS公布的各分数段评分标准看，其评分主要注重以下三个方面：①、逻辑分析能力(要求insightful);②、文章的组织(要求well-organized);③、语言能力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。
4. 尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分
由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。
但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。
GRE issue写作优秀实例：钱是否花在当下
题目：
”It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations.“
与其花钱进行可能有助于后代的长期性研究，还不如把钱花在迫在眉睫，已经存在的社会问题上。
正文：
In this contradictory era of pleasure and pain, loyalty and treachery, joy of life and fearof future, which arise a considerable of problems government has been bored by. No matter how serious and urgent one aspect turns out to be in a certain period,government is supposed to call for a balance between allocating money for immediateproblems and spending it on long-term research when making budget.
To be responsible for current citizens, government should solve those existing socialproblems, such as unemployment, illiteracy, and social crimes, in order to oil the socialmachine. To some extent, increasing the amount of jobs may get more benefit thanitself, because it is a way to release social pressure and dissatisfaction of thoseunemployed workers who may eventually become a ticklish factor to society.
Additionally, illiteracy is to society as the shortest baffle is to a cask. And it could donothing but lengthen the shortest baffle to the same length as the other baffles if morewater is supposed to be poured in this cask. As a malignant tumor, social crimes do harm to the economy and security of our society and, in some cases, is a potential fuse especially when there is an internal or external opposition to the government, so, to keep society stabilized and booming, government has to pay more attention to social crimes.
If not, citizens may feel under peril and lose confidence to the ruling class. As a result, for saving money, the government is bogged down in Sargasso Sea of troubles.Nonetheless, the governors are not born only for today’s people. That is to say,another significant and meaningful responsibility of government is to try its best to supply our posterity a society that consists of people who are well educated and obtain a desirable job or career, less juvenile crime and drug, and stable economy. As
H.W.Beecher pointed, “We should so live and labor in our time that what came to us as seed may go to the next generation as blossom, and what came to us as blossom may go to them as fruit. This is what we mean by progress.”It is true that long-term research could not give out an immediate value, for example,how to afforest a wasteland, but we shouldn’t be so narrow foci and misprize the real value normally coming up in about decades or more. “Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards”, said by Kierkergaard. The phrase “be lived forwards” here, in this case, means digging out the profit in future, the same as futures. Although no one knows whether or not the future is in concord with what we expect, we still could invest in it based on a pile of wide investigation and a cogent demonstration rather than a gambling.
Simply put, without spending money on immediate and existing social problems, our society cannot keep flourish and robust. Without investing on so many long-term researches, we will live no guarantees and aimless. Therefore, to ensure the stability and health as well as lasting development of our society, spending money on immediate social problems and investing on long-term researches weigh the same.
GRE issue写作优秀实例：竞争利弊问题
题目： ”Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society.“
归根结底，竞争对于社会是利多弊少。
正文：
Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.
First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of ”weak“ genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.
Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.
Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.
While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as ”Missed A here“whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.
That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to ”stream line“ their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this ”stream line“ process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.
In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.
It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.
Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.
篇5：如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
GRE写作满分要点解析，主要包括以下四点：
1、迎合GRE考试评卷人的评卷思路：
每个评卷人对你文章的评阅非常快，不可能对每个细节都很仔细地去看。考生应该迎合评卷人的评卷思路，用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达来体现自己的思路：首段要鲜明地提出观点，中间段落层次要拉开，每段的开始应该就是该段的topic sentence。
2、熟练掌握新GRE写作题库：
为了达到公平，ETS公布了它考试的所有写作题库，那么为了达到能和native speaker一起竞争，考生应该在考前对所有题目都进行预习(节约考试时的审题时间)，并通过100-150个提纲的写作了解GRE写作的一般结构，通过30-50篇写作来练习自己的写作思路和表达。对题库中的题目越熟练，对考试越有利。
3. 新GRE写作评分注重三方面
首先，从ETS公布的各分数段评分标准看，其评分主要注重以下三个方面：①、逻辑分析能力(要求insightful);②、文章的组织(要求well-organized);③、语言能力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。
4. 尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分
由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。
但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。
GRE写作高分范文：北美GRE写作满分范文
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
”Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.“
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
GRE首段
This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
GRE中间段1
The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
GRE中间段2
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
GRE中间段3
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
GRE末端
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
GRE这篇官方钦定满分的范文，其最明显的优点在于：
1. 字数高达599words, GRE充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。
2. 标准的五段制，首段、GRE末端，中间三段，看上去很美。
3. 没有陈词滥调、GRE满篇废话的模板式语言。
只有以上三点离满分还是很远的，GRE之所以SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各尽其责，既独立又统一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:
1. 首段再现了原TOPIC的推理过程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不适;尤其令阅卷人高兴的是：首段在最后简化罗列了推理中的三个问题。要知道美国人就喜欢的作文---总分式，在首段就把三个ideas罗列出来，然后在中间三段分别展开，先总后分，一目了然。
2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可谓是一针见血，一剑封喉。对于这样严重的推理漏洞，如果不首先指出，其argument必然软弱乏力。此所谓Topic中的 “必削点”，不可不察。
3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”这可谓是剑走偏锋，独辟蹊径，出人所料。文章竟然批评了Topic以钱为本经营理念，提出了要以人为本，这样写是有一定风险，毕竟这不是Issue。那本文是如何化险为夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得长舒一口，人家再次回归了，又回到了Topic中以“Money”为本的推理。
4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”这充分体现了作者不只是坐而论道的arguer，而是关心其可行性的现实主义者，考虑到方案本身的可行性和局限性。
5. 末端不但对首段提出的论点做出了重复性的总结，GRE而且又不厌其烦地把中间三段的ideas一一罗列。如此“啰嗦”估计令某些同学略有不齿，但这恰恰是美国人的最爱，cultural shock了吧?
本文最令我欣赏的地方，GRE就是对EXAMPLES的运用
1. 中间段一，运用了“设例”GRE(假设的情况)，$100 million啦、$5,000了，很幼稚是吧?可美国人喜欢啊;咱中国的学生，尤其是理工科的，喜欢用一些相当高深的例子，有没有想过那些阅卷老师能看懂吗?尤其是在极短时间内，他们IQ又不高，知识又不多，联想又不丰富……
2. 中间段二，运用了“具例”GRE(具体的例子)，举一个妇孺皆知的Toyota例子把想说明的问题统统道出，再次体现出美国人喜欢浅显易懂的事例。
3. 中间段三，运用了“泛例”GRE(某一类人、团体或组织)，通过采煤行业指出了计划可行性的所受到的制约，一个多么质朴无华的泛例，充分地考虑到了阅卷老师的理解能力。
以上这一切怎能不让美国阅卷者频频颔首，GRE啧啧称善呢?他或她手中的笔在纸上划出了一条美丽的弧线 —— 6
相反，有些中国学生，凭借自己繁密的逻辑、GRE渊深的例子和云雾缭绕的行文，每每令那些阅卷者咬唇咂舌，shrug连连，又怎能获得一个理想的分数呢?你挑战了他的智商，他必然报复你的分数。
GRE作文写作技巧之句子扩充
很多人苦恼句子写不长，一句话写下来才6~7个词不到，而且这还是用了前面说的in the first place的用法。怎么办?
举个例子，也通过扩充这个句子来阐述我所谓的写作的方法。
例子：Firstly, I agree with you.
比如有个学生要表达“首先我同意你”的这个意思，于是他写了这句话，再也写不下去了，不知道怎么办。
那好，首先，我再重申，不要去用那种很无聊的用in the first place替换firstly，因为这两个词都只不过是表达你下面要表达的内容的逻辑顺序，先说哪个后说哪个，重要但不是最重要的，别人要知道的是你首先要表达的到底是什么。如果你要想与众不同点可以把firstly改成primarily?词就显得高级了点。(但对老外来说差不多就是了)
再者就是重点了，写一个句子前你要问自己三个问题：1)你同意他到什么程度?非常同意，敷衍地同意，还是完全彻底的同意 2)你在哪个方面同意他?物质上，精神上，还是肉体上 3)同意他什么东西?他的意见，思维，行为，还是其他。4)什么样的意见?In short，当你写到这个同学的这个层面上的时候，只能说明你有了你要表达意思的框架，那你要表达的细节呢?相信大家其实都已经想好细节了，或者想都不用想心里一下就有谱了，但是因为是英语，所以大家怕于表达，哪怕是中文也懒于表达，为什么不表达出来呢!表达出来不就有字数了吗!而且把这些细节写出来，你整句话的表达就非常到位了，读者也能一下准确接受到你要表达的意思和深浅。而且这样的细节本身并不是为了凑字数用的，本来就是一种表达的需要，别人需要的是从你那里得到尽可能多的细节和信息。比如老板问你最近公司财务如何，你说还不错，老板会觉得你在敷衍他，因为你没有告诉他细节而他想知道的也是细节。同样的东西，写一句话你能尽可能得多问自己几个问题，多扣那些细节出来，那你表达不就到位了吗?
根据这个思路，我们来扩充一下这个同学的这句话：
比如说，我首先是完全同意你，再者我在精神上同意你，(可能物质上有困难)，同意的是你的观点(可能你的行为我就不同意了)，而且你的观点是独特的。这样一下，细节有了，就可以成句了。
Primarily, I totally agree with your unique opinion mentally.
这样句子就要八个词了，而这时候你只是不带感情的表达了你的意思，如果要再带上感情的表达，不就又有字数又有感情色彩了吗?这时候，还有一个问题，就是agree with其实还不准确，没有力度，或者说不够细节化，没有一种倾向性强烈的感觉，如果改成support，虽然这个词很简单，但是明显比agree with更给人以力度，也更有倾向性，让人更明白你是支持他的而不仅是同意而已，这就涉及到用词到位准确的问题，这在后面的内容会提到。
Primarily, I totally support your unique opinion mentally, whether rightly or wrongly.
不管对错与否，首先我都在精神上完全支持你独特的观点。
这时候句子就有12个词了，而四六级的句子一般都在12个词左右，这样的句子不仅字数上够了，还表达到位了，何乐而不为呢?
还有是一个用词的问题，也是一个非常大的问题，这就需要大家去积累了，需要去背词什么的了。
第一，用词要准确到位，尽量不要用那些很泛意思的词，比如说do, is, make, get等
例子：I walk along the river under the moonlight.. (walk，river)
请注意walk这个词，让我们假想你是在忙完一天繁重的工作后，诗情画意的沿小河走，这时候walk便不足以表达你的放松和惬意，用中文说此时的 walk就是散步，为什么不用amble呢?此时的amble更能说明你此时的心情而不仅仅是泛泛的走而已。同样的道理，river是泛指所有的河流，不分大小粗细，而如果你此时想那天你走的就是一条小溪而且那时确实很浪漫，brook是不是比river更加细节化而准确了呢?当然这都是基于你对词汇的掌握量和掌握的准确度有关，所以还是要下苦功夫去读去背。
所以成句后比较好的是:
I amble along the brook under the moonlight.
我在月光下沿着小溪散步
而用泛词或者不准确的表达会出现你的表达不准确甚至出丑，比如说你挤牛奶，写了get some milk from cattles,或者make some milk from cattles，翻译成中文就是从牛那儿搞点牛奶，或者取点牛奶，而且cattle是泛指所有的牛包括公牛和母牛(cow)，是不是很可笑而且很不地道，文章自然也大失色彩,让人判为低级。
第二，副词(组)或从句的使用
很多时候的使用往往可以收到很好的效果。副词就是形容一个状态或者行动的词，它可以表示程度，情况，方面等等，所以一句话里加上一两个副词很多时候可以让表达更准确。当每句话都用副词的话，句子不就很千篇 一律了?副词和一些副词词组的替换使用可以克服这个问题。
比如前面的agree with的那个例子，mentally就很准确的告诉了别人你同意的是在精神的层面上，物质上等等其他的不一定同意，因为没钱或者其他原因，这就限定和细节化了你所要表达的意思的范围。而如果当你发现你已经有一句了hastily,而后面那句还要表达草率的程度时候，不妨换个in hasty，这样词就避免了重复。
To sum up, 要准确的表达你的意思，一定要做到的两点就是第一能尽可能多的在句子中填加你要表达的细节，这些细节表达了你所到说的意思的程度和范围等等，第二就是要用词准确到位，不要为了凑字数而去凑字数，而要想的是最准确的告诉读者你所要表达的所有意思。这也是交流的关键。
篇6：GRE写作评分标准
GRE写作评分标准及ISSUE/ARGUMENT分数权重细节解读
GRE写作算分基本公式介绍
新GRE写作要求考生在30分钟+30分钟内分别完成两篇文章，它是美国所有作文考试中时间最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试。GRE写作的记分方式是这样的，两篇作文总分都是六分，计算公式为你的得分=(Issue的得分+Argument的得分)/2，最终的计分是以0.5分为一个格。
GRE写作不同题型要求简介
1. Issue task (30min)，要求作者根据所给题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。
2. Argument task (30min)，要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力的驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。
GRE作文两篇文章分数权重分析
首先GRE写作两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的。新GRE作文中有两个项目，最后出的GRE作文分数是一个，所以如何进行GRE作文算分呢?由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。
但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。
ETS写作评分标准概述
参照ETS评过分的范文，我们不难发现：无论是ISSUE还是ARGUMENT在评分标准上都有共同之处。
1. 观点要有深度，论证要有说服力;
2. 组织要有条理，表达清晰准确;
3. 语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富。
这三条分别说的是行文的“思想性”、“结构性”和“表达性”，众多高分作文的考生大凡都在这三个方面做得很好，我们理所当然也要从这里入手，采取“各个击破”的方法解剖GRE作文的本质，从而得到一个理想分数。
GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE
一 教育类 1. A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.”
2. While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation.
3. In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
4. Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.
5. Colleges and universities should offer more courses on popular music, film, advertising, and television because contemporary culture has much greater relevance for students than do arts and literature of the past.
6. It is primarily through formal education that a culture tries to perpetuate the ideas it favors and discredit the ideas it fears.
7. Some educational systems emphasize the development of students’ capacity for reasoning and logical thinking, but students would benefit more from an education that also taught them to explore their own emotions.
8. It is often asserted that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. In reality, however, formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
9. How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society.
10. Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
11. The purpose of education should be to provide students with a value system, a standard, a set of ideas—not to prepare them for a specific job.
12. Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Othervise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
13. Although innovations such as video, computers, and the internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE
二 学习类 1. We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose vies contradict our own. Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
2. No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.
3. Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction-in other words, to make things as simple as possible.
4. Students should memories facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little.
5. Scholars and researches should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.
6. In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.
7. Facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions.
8. Students should bring a certain skepticis to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
9. There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires.
10. The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
11. Critical judgment of work, in any given field has little value unless comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
12. People who pursue their own intellectual interests for purely personal reasons are more likely to benefit the rest of the world than are people who try to act for the public good.
13. Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
14. The study of ac academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes.
15. The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things.
16. As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious.
17. It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data.
GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE
三 行为类 1. Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, they in fact, prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
2. Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.
3. Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image.
4. The concept of ‘individual responsibility’ is a necessary fiction. Although societies must hold individuals accountable for their own actions, people’s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
5. People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.
6. In any realm of life-whether academic, social, business, or political— the only way to succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of vies. Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superceded by simpler, more immediate options.
7. It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
8. Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.
9. Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity.
10. People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are the most critical of it.
11. No amount of information can eliminate prejudice because prejudice is rooted in emotion, not reason.
12. The most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed in particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
13. Sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes.
14. In any given field, the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that differ from those held by the majority.
15. It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual.
16. Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and--, eventually, --to change it.
17. Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy, the relative ease of finding a job, and the salary they can expect to make. Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or interest in a particular kind of work.
18. If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable.
19. People often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms, we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
20. People are mistaken when they assume that the problems they confront are more complex and challenging than the problems, faced by their predecessors. Thus illusion is eventually dispelled with increased knowledge and experience.
21. Moderation in all things is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, ‘Moderations is most things,’ since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus.
22. Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty—whether to one’s friends, to one’s school or place of employment, or to any institution—is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.
篇7：雅思写作评分标准
第一个标准是切题(Task Achievement).很多考生对这个标准的理解其实停留在不跑题的层面,所以他们考完后都认为自己语法词汇俱佳，却不知道自己为什么分数不高。其实不然，考官要看到的作文不但紧扣主题，而且要论证充分。如果考生要证明的观点只有1-2个分论点，而且每个分论点的Supporting Details也不充分，肯定是很难拿高分的。
第二个评分标准是衔接与连贯(Coherence&Cohesion)。很多考生简单认为要多写逻辑连词就能做到衔接与连贯。其实这也是个片面的理解。没错，逻辑连词非常重要，但是，不是衔接与连贯的全部。很多考生过去追求逻辑连接而忽视了Contents本身，忽视了对最Powerful&Persuasive论证的选取。剑七的第171页一篇Band7的意思作文，考官的评语里就有:” There is some under-use of cohesive devices and some incorrect referencing, but links bet ween sentences and paragraphs can be clearly followed. “ 上句发送我们一个信息，逻辑连接词的使用不足是问题，但是内容本身也不能出问题，所以写作要讲究形式也要注意本质。剑六的162也一篇7.5分的考生范文，考官评价道:”There are too many errors in cohesion, however, and some linkers are not always fully approximately“,这也印证了考生往往会一不留神地形似而忘内容本身的错误。
第三个评分标准是：词汇资源(Lexical Resources). 我们对雅思写作词汇有两个误解，一个上文已经提到，认为越大越好，殊不知浓缩的才是精华的。第二个误解是写作的选词越大越好，比如写贫穷，很多学生写 impoverishe
d 或者impecunious，他们认为出现频率越少的词汇分数越高。所以词汇量不到自然没有信心。其实不然，写作的词汇技巧在剑六剑七的考官评语中可以N次发现这个词--Paraphrase. 有时候写的是inadequacy of paragraph(剑七page166)， 有时候写paraphrase is not always logical(剑七169). 其实这里面隐藏了一个潜规则。我们可以使用词性转换的方式，定语从句，后置定语改写的方式来同义替换而不是单单从近义词或者同义词这个层面。比如我们可以写 those who are in need 表示穷人，或者people living in poverty,或者 those who are financially incapable 都是很好的替换穷的表达。
第四个标准是语法结构的范围和准确性(Grammatical Range and Accuracy)。这里面也有一个潜规则，那就是很多考生认为长难句，或者说语法越难越高分。所以他们常常根据高考英语语法的水平衡量自己写作的语法水平。其实这是完全不同的两个概念。原因很简单，高考考的都是”纠结中的纠结“，雅思写的都是”复杂中的简单“。我们仔细看看剑六剑七后面的7分和7.5分的考生范文，还有考官8分范文我们发现，考生习惯性写长难句考官却习惯写简单语法。我们发现考官的范文中常见语法中最多的是：并列句。这是一个出乎很多考生意料的结果，呵呵。比如剑七page168,小作文的一段就两句话共65个字。两句话都是并列句。In 1980 Australia used coal as the main electricity sources(50units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydro power(each producing 20 units) and oil(which produced only 10 units). By 2000, coal had became the fuel for more than 75% of electri city produced and only hydro continued to be another significant sou rce supplying approximately 20%.
篇8：雅思写作评分标准
1. 任务完成情况
任务完成情况主要包括三个方面：内容(content)是否切题，立场(position)是否鲜明并得到有效阐释，结构(structure)是否有逻辑性。
内容如何做到切题，关键在于审题时要找准题目的主题(topic)以及针对该主题所提出的问题(topic questions)。一般来说，主题就是题目中反复出现或主句中充当主语或宾语的名词以及名词短语，而问句则通常就是我们要讨论的要点，如果要点理解有误或漏掉某个要点，则都属于没有切题。譬如：
With the increasing use of mobile phones, less people tend to write letters. Some people believe that writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
从这个题目当中我们不难看出writing letters出现的频率较高，且都在主句中出现，说明它就是我们要找的主题，如果你过多描述mobile phones给我们带来的好处就跑题了。另外，题目的写作任务也很清楚：Do you agree that writing letters will disappear completely? 属于“支持或反对”类的题，必须明确表达你的立场，不能既同意又不同意，同时表达你同意或不同意的理由。
立场要做到鲜明并得到有效阐释需要有如下几个内容：topic sentence(主题句)，main ideas(论点)，supporting points(论据)。主题句通常放在文章的首段，开门见山地表明你的立场，主题句只能有一个;论点放在中间段的首句，让读者一目了然，论点应该有两个以上，否则论证就不充分;论据包括evidence(证据)、examples(例子)等，放在论点后面，每个论点都应该有论据作支撑，否则就会显得论据不足。
合理的文章结构通常由三大部分组成，即引言(introduction)、主体(body)和结论(conclusion)，写4-5段比较合理。引言要涵盖主题、写作任务和主题句，主体则要包括足够的论点和论据，结论可以重申观点、提出建议或展望未来。在这里需要提醒大家一定要认真审题，许多考生在考试的时候没有看清题目要求，明明题目分析优缺点，有些同学却写成了同意与否的题目，整篇文章走题，只能取得5分以下的分数。
2. 连贯与衔接
文章的连贯性主要体现在段落与段落之间，句子与句子之间。
段落之间的“启”、“承”、“转”、“合”可通过表顺序的过渡词完成，譬如：
表示开始：first of all, in the first place, at the very beginning, to begin with, currently, at present, for one thing等。
表示承接：besides, further more, in addition, moreover, what’s more, meanwhile, apart from, as well as, similarly, in the same way等。
表示转折：however, whereas, while, on the contrary, in contrast, on the other hand等。
表示结论：in conclusion, in brief, in short, to sum up, ultimately, overall等。
句子之间的逻辑关系也要通过一些逻辑连词来完成，譬如：
表示原因：because (of ), accordingly, due to, owing to, for this reason, since, as a result, as a consequence等。
表达观点：in my opinion, personally, from my viewpoint, it seems to me, it is clear to me that, as far as I am concerned
举例说明：for example, for instance, as follows, such as, that is to say, namely, just as, in particular等。
表示让步：although, in spite of, despite of, despite the fact that, regardless of等。
建议大家可以在平日的练习中多多使用这些连词造句，不能只认识而不会使用，例如in spite of 和 despite这两个词后面只能跟短语而不能跟句子，这都是同学们在作文中常常犯的错误。
3. 词汇资源
词汇的多少并不能决定文章的好坏，但用词的精准性是可以加分的。一般来说词汇的准确表达可以通过两个方面达到，一是在用词的难度上拔高，二是在近义词的多种表达上提升。譬如要描述一个好人，很多同学首先想到的形容词就是good, kind, wise, nice, clever, great, bright等词，而这些词往往很难出彩，因为描述太过于抽象，如果能用到诸如ambitious, tactful, eloquent, charismatic, committed之类的词就很具体了。当然，这些词需要我们平时的日积月累，不是靠一两天的功夫就可以运用自如的。还有，值得提醒的是不要认为这些词好就过分堆积，会给考官留下华而不实的感觉，正如优秀的厨师往往都不会用太多的佐料，而只需油盐就可以了。
雅思写作取得高分的关键在于灵活地运用词汇，多使用非常用词汇，分数一般来说不会低于5.5分。因此，在日常学习中，如何区别低分词汇和高分词汇是关键所在。中国考生一般来说可以比较正确的表达出自己的观点，但是对于词汇和句式的使用就有些茫然了，经常会重复使用词汇，句式也只会用简单句。举一个例子，英语中的‘我认为’有无数种说法，大多数中国考生只会用‘I think’ , 值得注意的是，学术写作中的 ‘我认为’不能使用这个词组，I contend, from my point of view, as far as I am concerned, I argue, I assert…这些词汇都是学术英语中表示个人观点的高分词汇。
4. 语法的多样性和准确性
句子的好坏主要取决于句子结构的准确性和丰富性，句子的长度和复杂性以及用语的逻辑性和正式性。
句子结构的准确性涉及主谓一致、句子平衡性等问题，比如：The main reason for this use of informal languages are various and complicated. 这个句子不细心的同学很难发现它有问题，因为主语太长有时会忽视真正的主语其实是the main reason，是个单数形式，所以are 应该改为is. 再比如：In my opinion, use mobile phones to send messages is more convenient than write letters. 这是个很典型的错误，很多同学在写作的过程当中会误把动词或动词短语当主语用而造成句子结构的错误，而只有动词的非谓语形式才能在句中充当主语或宾语，因此，此句正确的表达应该是：In my opinion, using mobile phones to send messages is more convenient than writing letters.
句子结构的丰富性也是考官给分的一个亮点，好的段落应该由不同的句式组成，而不应该是千篇 一律的句子结构。例如：I have many hobbies. For example, I like movies, I like playing basketball and football, and I like singing and dancing. 很明显，该句完全由“I + do”结构组成且like使用的频率过高，我们不妨做如下修改：I have many hobbies. Movies, for example, are my favorite and I am also fond of playing basketball and football. Sometimes when staying with my friends, I’d prefer singing and dancing rather than any other way of amusement.
句子的长度和难度是很多考生追求的目标，其实并不需要每个句子都写得很长很复杂，相反，如果整篇文章都是长难句，考官也会觉得很厌烦，就像一个人喜欢吃红烧肉，如果你天天给他吃红烧肉，他也会觉得很腻味一样，因此最好的方法就是长短句结合。
短句变长：即善用连接词and, but, or, yet, so等。例如：Living off campus is exciting. Living off campus is more independent. I prefer the convenience of living on campus. 不难看出，这是两种对立的观点，因此我们可以将其变为：Living off campus is exciting and more independent, but I prefer the convenience of living on campus.
还有比较重要的一点是不容忽视的，即用语的正式性和严谨性。实际上，在汉语中也有很多这样的例子，比如我们说：“这里人真多啊!”这就是一个典型的口语化的表达方式，而如果用“人山人海”、“车水马龙”、“摩肩接踵”等词来形容人多就是写作语言了。我们不妨看几个非正式用语的句子：Parents have to get kids food and other stuff. 此句中的kids和stuff就是两个非正式用语，如变成：Parents have to provide children with food and other necessities.就正式了。再如：People always say competitive sports are totally cool. 此句中的cool以及这个句式都是属于比较口语化的，应该变为：It is always said that competitive sports benefit us in several important ways.
专家为大家分析了雅思考试的四个标准，考生们一定要仔细琢磨，只要静下心来好好领悟评分标准，再通过一定量的写作来提升自己全方位的能力，就可以获得满意的成绩。写作不存在侥幸，也没有捷径，必须要下足功夫，否则想要提高写作分数是很困难的。
★ 命题写作范文
★ 文章写作
★ 论文写作
★ 教育写作材料范文
用写作评分标准教你如何备考写作（通用8篇）
