“西瓜糖”通过精心收集，向本站投稿了7篇GRE写作5.5分经验，以下文章小编为您整理后的GRE写作5.5分经验，供大家阅读。
- 目录
篇1：GRE写作5.5分经验
GRE写作5.5分经验分享
一开始我准备的argument，因为我3月过生日和很多朋友分别聚了下，就耽误了快一个星期吧，所以我准备5天写写argument，熟悉下，然后花15天准备issue，最后留15天模拟考试。事实上我也是这么做的，虽然时间只有一个月左右吧，但是因为逃了基本所有能逃的课程，没有其他事情烦，加上我也没有花一点点时间来准备笔试，所以这个月的时间还算是充分。
先说前5天的argument(计划是一天一篇)，看了一些范文之后，我开始写，开始走了个弯路，就是我用了模式写作，模仿范文。前两篇，我发现一模一样，而且我想，大概很多人都这么写，都这么用闪光句型，那不是很多人写一样的文章了?
然后刚好这个时候我看了网上的帖子，说模式作文不好，没有个性，我很认同他的看法，就改变了我的argument风格，先是多看一些比较精彩但是不拘一格的范文，然后思考，这些作文特殊在哪些地方，然后我也试着写一写比较特殊的。写了几个，就开始有了自己的特殊风格，然后自己的模式也浮现出来。
计划是5天的argument训练可能用了7、8天吧，但是模式基本出来了。虽然还是不太清楚，但是这个时候因为时间紧了，必须转向比较难的issue了。
突破GRE考试难点：GRE Issue思路解析1
105, 106 & 126
In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
突破GRE考试难点：GRE Issue思路解析2
105, 106 & 126
In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
艺术(Avatar, Van Gogh vs. Da Vinci)
参见No. 5-3 Section A短阅读
各领域中两者都有重要作用
学术界(凯库勒发现苯环benzene结构)(参见翻译练习)
商业(Jobs：想象力帮助他设想未来产品，tablet computer, Siri, iCloud;知识帮助这些技术成为可能)
突破GRE考试难点：GRE Issue思路解析3
105, 106 & 126
Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
篇2：GRE写作高分经验
GRE写作高分经验分享 立论驳论文提分心得不可不看
以下就是我自己总结一点小技巧：首先，我在准备GRE写作备考时，最重要的一个步骤在于熟悉题库和认真准备提纲。
GRE立论文issue经验分享
对于立论文(Issue)说，我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是非常有用的，你可以参考各种资料，但必须勤动脑，想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。
GRE驳论文argument怎么练?
对于驳论文(Argument)而言，我认为熟悉题库更为重要。正常情况下是这样的，但的确有些难题若不事先好好准备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。
写驳论文有很多小窍门，如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的能力，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的逻辑漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。
GRE作文逻辑重要吗?
虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE的精华——因为GRE考的就是逻辑，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析水平。
怎样看待GRE作文中的语言水平?
至于GRE作文的语言，其实不是很重要，只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了，掌握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。希望可以给大家一些参考，从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。
新GRE写作：审查的公正性
题目：
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
审查很少能够做到公正。
范文：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while to arouse applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.
新GRE写作：权威问题
题目：
Much of the information that people assume is ‘factual’ actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a ‘fact’ should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so, I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things, however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with, the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to argue that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno, the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for, while just a minor particle in it. Equally, no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity, the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one, and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However, what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that, due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability, they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time, our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits, the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases, and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism, no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr, because their theories are based on distinct views, the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts, these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament, the conclusions we make might well be justifiable, if not completely right, to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application, instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body, they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients, of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up, while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately, for the reason of the limitation of the abilities, I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves, as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis, I would argue once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable, we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
篇3：GRE写作：满分经验
决定考G本来就是一时冲动的结果，因为对于我来说要付出巨大的时间成本，并且接受短期内得不到任何实际的收益这一事实。
然而，当我看到很多同学纷纷加入到考G行列中，自己也鼓足勇气参加了，就算是为了一个梦，为了自己的将来能有多一点的选择，能够为机会多做尝试。
备考的过程我并没有经历太多的辛酸和劳苦，我很佩服一些学院的同学要在期末顶着论文、实验、期末考试等种.种压力复习备考，我的大量时间大概和大多数人一样花在了单词上。红宝书翻过几遍已经不记得了，也翻过barron's list(但事实证明效果并不好)。
至于说技巧或者经验，在这里我也只能谈一谈我对这个考试的一点感受，希望能给其他同学一点启发。
作文：不要轻视argument
能拿满分对于我来说很意外。关于字数，当时我的情况大概是：“issue500+”，“argument600+”也许大家都在奇怪为什么我argument能写的比issue多，其实我想告诉大家不要看轻argument，不要因为它容易就倾向性的少付出努力，不要忘记评分的时候两部分的权重是一样的。
argument的模版大家应该见过很多，但在这里我想说的是既不要完全套用模版，因为这样会有雷同的危险，也不鼓励在文章结构上过分的创新，可以参考模版提供的结构。写作时不要让人感觉你是在“码字儿”，文章的思想和逻辑性永远是最重要的，也是拿高分的关键。
所以在开头和结尾的评价总结性语句中，你要注意和你在正文中的分析是否匹配，所谓匹配不在于用几个专业定性的词汇，而是要在细节上完美对应。当然把握这一点并不容易，因为涉及到用词和表达能力，在这一点上就要看你个人的水平了，词不在于华丽，而是要准确并且前后一致，并且尽量减少重复。
Issue也是一样，我一直觉得要“意在笔先”，作文最重要的是你要有话可说，这就是为什么在字数上争论没有意义了，你的观点立意一般，你又没有太多的话可说，字数自然上不去，随意的拼凑不见得能拿高分。关于issue还有一点要说，就是宁愿往深里写也不要扩大范围的泛泛而谈。我写的题目是关于英雄反映了一个社会的价值观的，整篇文章我只引用了MichaelJordan这一个例子，当然在选例子的时候也要有讲究。我看到很多人花很多时间和精力搜集素材，写文章的时候喜欢方方面面地进行列举，我不大赞同这样的做法，因为如果例子不是你熟悉的，引用起来也只能停留在浅层次，而没有深度。
语文：多做新题目
能拿到600分，完全靠的是我阅读的功底，还有一点运气，因为这次阅读相对简单。
考试当天没能够跨区对我来说损失很大，很多题目就是一念之差。所以在这里要提醒大家珍惜做新题目的新鲜感，而不要把过多的时间花在反复看已经解决好了的老题目上。这次G6的类反比并不难，既没有偏词怪词，也没有考什么特别的逻辑关系，但是从题目到题支都很少有和过去题目重复的地方。这就是为什么要大家这样做的原因。
篇4：GRE写作：满分经验
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives.”
I disagree with the portion of the “Specialists of all kinds are highly overated” statement. Specialists are persons who take care of certain tasks or a specific area of whatever the case may be. These persons contibute more time and effort than those with general titles. the specialists are the ones who can tell or give the client more details on what is happening to them. The generalist can only give broad ideas which can be a number of things. The specialist narrows the ideas down to the specifics. For example if one goes to a “general practioner doctor” for pains in the chest area, he would tell the client that the poblem may be heart burns, or something else that's not be so serious, depending on the symptoms. He may also refer him to a cardiologist to be sure it's not any thing else. The point I'm making is that specialist are people who can help us out even more that our generalist. Also the fact that one would go to a specialist only in dire needs.
COMMENTARY
The response presents a position on the issue but the development of that position is seriously flawed. The writer begins by disagreeing with the assertion that “specialists...are highly over-rated” and then attempts to define and contrast specialists and generalists. The attempt is unsuccessful, partly because the descriptions are vague and ill-conceived.
Whereas the example of going to a “general practitioner doctor” is certainly relevant, the writer's claim that a general practitioner would tell a patient with chest pains that the problem “may be heart burns or something else that's not so serious” seems far-fetched.
The response is further weakened by poor word choice and by numerous errors in sentence structure, usage, and grammar. These problems, while not severe enough to seriously interfere with meaning, contribute to the overall rating of “2.”
篇5：GRE写作冲刺经验
GRE写作冲刺经验
GRE作文最后冲刺经验谈：首先，我们在最后几天得树立自己的信心，没有信心，考试肯定会慌，容易发挥失常。我们的目标很明确，我们大多数人不是冲着6分去的，我们理科生4分够了，文科生得5分，关键还是我们的专业水平，研究能力。
我们应该看的是argument的各种类型错误的总结，这个一定要熟，我们考场想正常发挥，肯定得靠反射型思维，毕竟，argument是我们的重头戏。比如我们对于一个建议我们要考虑如下：
这个改变是否多余?现状是否足够应付?这个改变要多少钱呢?能够承担吗?有没有其他的更好的方法呢?是否所有人都需要?有无成功先例?效果如何?有无副作用?有无考虑受影响的人的态度和意见?
对于一个比较对象我们需要考虑：
代表性?他因?是否是异常?以前的正常的状态不是这样。aberration采取措施的改善效果程度如何?What extent to the participants improve。
趋势能否保持?有没有不利的方面没有提供?时间太短看不出效果?以前的经验不能反映现在实际情况。
我们还有study方面的问题：
代表性?数量够吗?统计时间是什么时候吗?权威性?表述真实意见吗?
这个前人总结得很好了。还有其他的一些错误，如，过去-〉现在;全局-〉局部;局部-〉全局;数量不代表比例，总量上升可能比例下降。其实关键在于他因的积累，这个可以丰富一篇argument的内容，增加它的可信性,我下面举几个常见的例子：商品的销售情况，市场，利润：a function of supply and demand; quality; price;formidable competitor; national and international economic climate;demographic changes; company“s reputation; ad strategy;a waning of interest in X.X.X among people;supply or distribution problems; market has become satutated; management and market problem; the changes of policy and law;material and labor price; improvement in training of workers....
其实这个是大家积累的过程...这个大家用一个本子去记，很快就可以收到很多了。
句型其实很简单，但我不鼓励大家用模版，因为它会限制你的思路，其实每个题都有各自的特色，我们在驳论的过程中，需要很大灵活性，这个可以多看看范文，打开我们驳论的思路，看老外280会抑制自己的写作思路的。因此，我认为关键要找到自己常用写作风格的句型。这个得自己去主动发现，去找。
看完了这些已经烂熟于心的阿狗套路和思路后，我们应该去总结一下自己的一休的思路，其实写多的人会发现所有的题都有一些共同点，我们可以从某几个方面去研究，这其实我觉得能用上很多哲学的东西。比如，事物变化论，举个例子吧，历史与现实的很多题就可以用到，社会和行为很多道也可以用;万事都是不同的;人的社会性;科学的局限性;群众的力量是无限的;社会精英论;人的天性;人的思维局限性;社会资源的有限性;人的偏见性;人的主观能动性。
还有一些其他的共同点，就是定义和起源。写文章的一种思路：刨根问底去看问题的产生是为何?为什么会出现这样的问题?这叫历史唯物主义，从问题的本质和事务的概念开始发散的去写，去想，可以打开思路;还有一种叫辩证唯物主义，我们要去想想，过于极端的去承认某种观点，或否认会出现什么问题呢?如果没有了这种东西，会是什么样的呢?
我认为考场发挥的最关键因素是你的模考如何。不是说你的次数越多越有用。如下几点得注意：
1.要在思想上把模考看成正式考试。
2.可能按照考试时间安排模考时间。而且中间不能休息，连续写一篇一休和一篇argument
3.议录上狂敲键盘声(考场上的隔音不好)，然后模考时狂重放，既可以模拟考场的紧张气氛，也可以练一下个人的抗干扰能力。
对于机警，我蛮相信的，关键在于我们机警覆盖面不够大，缺少热心的人们上传机警。还有一点是我希望以后的人写机警时还要注上自己的学科。这个很重要。如果你不嫌麻烦而且时间多的话，我建议你去考场那里埋伏几天，打听所有的人题目。当然最好是有人可以帮你干这件事。
但对我那个十二天和四天的规律不信，因为本身就有问题，大家想一下就知道了，十二天和四天之间也就隔八天，是不是八天的也要看呢?其实我觉得关键在于每个人的专业和学历有关，当然还有你父母的咯。到时候这些都是问卷的一部分。大家要好好填哦。
还有一点提醒大家，考前的若干天，记住休息和睡眠，千万不可以生病，如果你考试那天你已经很兴奋了，不要去喝红牛，吃巧克力。这个不是所有人都适合的。
GRE写作解析
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.
”On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals.“
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
步骤：夏天人口增多 + 摩托车是主要交通工具 → 到了夏天摩托车引起的事故会增多
假设：夏天增多的人口会造成严重的摩托车问题
反例：城市交通秩序好，摩托车司机都很职业，很守规矩，历年来都没出什么事故
补充证据：往年夏天的摩托车事故率
步骤：SV执行了摩托车禁令 + 之后SV的事故减少50% → 是禁令减少的事故
假设：没有它因
反例：道路拓宽;司机培训更严格;交通法规更严格;警察多了
补充证据：……
步骤：SV成功 → BI成功
假设：两城的租赁摩托车都是主要摩托车的来源;过去两城摩托车都能够租出去
反例：SV的摩托车都是租的，但是BI的摩托车都是私家的;SV的都租出去了，但是BI的本来就租不到每天25辆
补充证据：两城摩托车的主要来源;既往摩托车每天实际租赁量
步骤：BI成功减少夏天的事故→全年事故的减少
假设：夏天的事故是全年事故的主要来源
反例：夏天路况好，人多不是事故的来源。全年事故主要来源于冬天路面结冰。而冬天车辆没减少，所以事故不会减少50%
证据：全年的事故数量变化表。
GRE写作官方题库高频ARGUMENT题目满分范文分享：research on chlidren in Tertia island
GRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目：
Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.
【满分范文赏析】
It might seem logical, at first glance, to agree with the argument in Dr. Karp’s article that children in Tertia are actually raised by their biological parents (and perhaps even, by implication, that an observation-centered approach to anthropological study is less valid than an interview-centered one). However, in order to fully evaluate this argument, an audience should be provided with additional evidence.
【本段结构】本段采用了简明的Argument开头段结构，即C—F的开头结构。段落首先概括原文的Conclusion，接下来给出开头段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即其应提供额外的Evidence才能让观众对该Argument进行充分评价。
【本段功能】本段作为Argument开头段，具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论，即Tertia的孩子们的确是由他们的亲生父母所抚养的，并且以观察为中心的人类学研究方法不如以面试为中心的研究方法有效。本段对原文结论的归纳为正文段中即将进行的具体攻击作铺垫。
The audience should know, before deciding conclusively about the appropriate methodology for further study, if Tertia has changed significantly in the past 20 years. Dr. Field conducted his observational study 20 years ago and it is possible that Tertia has changed significantly since then. For example, if we had evidence suggesting that, since the original study, foreigners had settled on the island and introduced a new element that affected child rearing in Tertia, it would certainly weaken Dr. Karp’s argument. In that case, the original study could have been accurate and Dr. Karp’s study could be correct.
【本段结构】本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第一个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。
【本段功能】本段作为正文第一段，攻击原文中出现的第一个重要逻辑错误——(时间上的)错误类比。在对合适的研究方法做出决定性的判断之前，观众应当被告知Tertia是否在过去的内发生了显著的变化。Field博士是在20年前开展了他的观察性研究，而自那时起Tertia可能发生了显著的变化。例如，我们如果有证据证明后来外国人在岛上定居并引入了一种影响了Tertia的孩子抚养方式的新因素，Karp博士的论证无疑会被削弱。在这种情形下，Field博士原先的研究可能是准确的，Karp博士的研究也可能是正确的。
Further, in order to fully evaluate this claim the audience needs to learn more about the interview questions that Dr. Karp’s team used—what exactly did they ask? We don’t know, nor do we know what the children’s responses actually were. What did they say about their biological parents? The mere fact that they speak more frequently about their biological parents than they do about other adults does not mean that their biological parents had a greater role than the community did in their rearing. It would significantly undermine Dr. Karp’s argument if it turned out that the children said things like how much they missed their parents or how their parents had left them in a communal environment. Without knowing what the children said, one cannot accept the argument above without reservations.
【本段结构】本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第三个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。
【本段功能】本段作为正文第三段，攻击原文中出现的第三个重要逻辑错误——调查类错误。为充分评价原文中的论断，观众需要就Karp博士所采用的面试问题获得更多的信息。我们既不知道他们所问问题的具体内容，也不知道孩子们的具体答案。仅仅是孩子们更经常谈到他们的亲生父母这一事实并不意味着他们的亲生父母在抚养他们的过程中比社区占有更主要的角色。如果事实证明孩子们经常说一些诸如他们多么想念父母或者他们的父母是如何把他们留在了一个集体环境中的事情的话，Karp博士的论证将被显著地削弱。在不知道孩子们究竟说了些什么的情况下，我们不能无保留地接受原文的论证。
It is slightly more difficult to discuss the evidence we might need in order to evaluate the more interesting claims in Dr. Karp’s article, namely his extension of the results of his study to a conclusion that interview-centered methods are inherently more valid than observational-centered approaches in the case of study in the group of islands including Tertia. In order to fully evaluate this claim one would require more examples of interview-based and observation-based anthropological studies and we would also need to look into different study designs. Perhaps Dr. Field did not conduct an effective observational study, but other observational approaches could be effective. In order to make such grandiose claims, Dr. Karp really needs to provide a lot of additional evidence (ideally a meta-analysis of hundreds of anthropological studies).
【本段结构】本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第四个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。
【本段功能】本段作为正文第四段，攻击原文中出现的第四个重要逻辑错误——外推类错误。在Karp博士的文章中，他将自己的研究结果推广到了以面试为中心的研究方法比以观察为中心的研究方法在研究包括Tertia在内的一组岛屿时本质上更有效这一结论。为充分评价这一论断，我们需要更多的以面试为中心的人类学研究和以观察为中心的人类学研究的例子，并且我们还需要考察不同的研究设计。或许Field博士并未开展一项有效的观察式研究，而其它的观察式研究均可能是有效的。为了做出如此宏大的论断，Karp博士实在需要提供很多额外的证据。
篇6：如何打破雅思写作5.5分
雅思写作：手把手教你打破雅思写作5.5
雅思写作复习方法：话题思路整理
一篇作文的内容决定了其逻辑结构并成为语言展示的载体。也就是说，如果写作内容不扣题、不够客观、缺少细节，是无法给逻辑和语言打出分数的。
大作文的复习必须从各个话题母题(经典高频考题)及预测题目的思路整理出发，通过学习成熟写作内容来打开思路，练习审题，以保证作文内容的扣题。
如果写作时难以提出观点、观点又无法拓展或只能在尴尬的硬凑字数都是由于缺少这一部分的充分准备。很多同学痴迷于总结跨越话题界限的万能思路，忽略话题间的差异性，结果瞬间被考官判为套用模板。
比如：在大陆考区，近70%的考生只要写到Report(说明文)类题型，所有问题的解决方案都是“政府提高人们意识和有关部门颁布相关法律”;只要是Argumentation(议论文)类题型，分论点就一定是从个人和政府两个角度出发，这是分析了几个话题总结而来的呢?个人和政府不是万能写作角度，只是有时会需要提及的方面。
有的考生将作文内容针对性减弱，还体现在忽略同话题但不同讨论对象写作内容的差异性。当然，这是进一步的问题，是考生无法拿取6.5及以上分数的主要原因。突破这一瓶颈，定要学会使用写作最重要的“具象思维”，即结合实际生活思考，客观有细节的论证。
雅思写作复习方法：准确判断写作任务及文章逻辑结构
传统的备考方法注重题目表面陈述方式的差异性，比如：议论文 Argumentation(议论文)类题型题目的陈述方式常见的有：
1. 一个观点的讨论 提问方式：To what extent do you agree or disagree? / What is your opinion on this statement(=issue)?
2. 两个观点的讨论 提问方式：Discuss both opinions and give your own idea.
3. 讨论现象或事物的利弊：Do the advantages of... outweigh the disadvantages? / Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of...
上述三点看似不同，但并没有实质性的差别，它们都体现出了唯一的写作要求：即辩证的分析题目中提出的讨论内容并表明态度。其实，如果按照国外预科语言课程写作题型分类来判断，Argumentation(议论文)类题型分为三种Influence，Prediction，Solution;这种题型的分类更注重写作任务本身，而非题目的表面陈述方式。
不少同学经常纠结写作用什么样的文章结构，有时为了图省事甚至会忽略具体题目提前决定考场上使用的“万能套路”。要谨记：文章的中心观点决定文章逻辑结构，而不是题目表面的陈述方式;更不能忽略不同题目写作内容的差异来刻意统一出一个“最容易得分”的结构。换句话说，写作评分标准里第一项文章内容的确定在先，第二项文章逻辑结构的判断其次，是根据内容需求选择逻辑结构。
雅思写作复习方法：注意句法
词汇和语法的备考是一个整体，因为语言表达的最小单位是句子。拆散词汇和语法的关系，写作就成了展现原创语言的汉英翻译练习。一般情况下，大多数考生作文词汇和语法的得分不会超过1个分数档，原因也正是如此。
根据不同话题、就不同讨论对象整理写作思路时，考生需要搭配学习、记忆句式表达和段落篇章。此外，还需根据不同写作任务和文章逻辑结构准备句式表达，以保证文章框架句式准确到位，但要注意不可冗杂赘余。最后，一定要学习写作核心句法。
一篇文章字数多数情况下在260至270范围内，以7分作文为例，句子数目一般为18句左右，需要展现至少12种不同的句法知识。所以，考官范文高频句法除最基本的“There be句型，定语从句，It is + adj.+ that句型，宾语从句，状语从句”，还有哪些呢?不可不知。
三个月内拿下雅思写作高分的备考方法
很多基础差的学生在雅思的学习中都有这样的感觉，其他的几个方面都在短期的培训中有所提高，唯独写作很难有个很高的提高，尤其是基础差的考生，达到了五分之后，很难再提高到六分或者更高了，一直在五分左右徘徊。
要知道雅思写作考试中最主要考察大家的是什么，肯定很多同学会说是语法，词汇或英语的运用能力等，不可否认，这些知识对雅思写作非常的关键，但通过我这么多年的雅思写作的教学经验来说，我认为最重要的是要写出真正的英语，也就是说尽量少出现中式英语的东西，也就是我们常说的“Chinglish”。那如何能在短时间内避免出现中式英语的错误呢，最好的方法就是多收集这方面的材料，不要犯类似的错误。下面是一些同学在写作中经常犯的一些错误，还有我的分析，希望对大家能有所帮助。
1. 概念的错误
在写作中，有类词语表面上看似乎是对的,但实际上却没有表达出你想要表达的意思,有时恰恰适得其反。用这类词语写成的英语句子常常引起误解。
① (误)When we go into society after graduation, we will encounter many difficulties.
(正)When we start to work after graduation, we will encounter many difficulties.
“go into society”没有汉语“进入社会”的含义。在西方,它是指一个人到一定的年龄可以开始社会交往,如结交异性朋友,进入某些社交或公共场所等。而汉语“进入社会”一般指学生中学或大学毕业后参加工作。
② (误)Left alone in the jungle at night ,she felt very dangerous.
(正)Left alone in the jungle at night, she felt t hat she was in great danger.
“dangerous”与作者要表达的意思完全相反。说某人dangerous,实际上是说他在某一方面对某人构成危胁,而不是处于危险的境地。这个词用错,意思就完全变了。原意是“她”感到处于危险中。
2、搭配不当
用词搭配是我国学生学英语最感棘手的地方,在雅思写作中，这种错误也是经常出现的，所以希望大家引起重视，因为中文里的某些词语在不同的语境里,英语有不同的说法,而这些说法是约定俗成的,完全是习惯用法所致,我们稍有不慎,便会犯错。现举一些考生在考试中常犯的错误:
① (误)At college, we should learn as much knowledge as possible so t hat we can be well prepared for our future career.
(正)At college, we should acquire as much knowledge as possible so t hat we can be well prepared for our future career.
“学习知识”是学生写作时经常用到的词组,但不少学生都写成learn knowledge,实际上knowledge是不能与learn搭配的,只能与acquire,obtain,absorb,accumulate ,develop,advance,gain,broaden ,enlarge,impart,derive ，deepen, brush up, digest 等词搭配使用。
② (误)In July, they will take part in the final term examinations.
(正)In July, they will take t he final term examinations.
“examination”或“test”不能与“take part in”搭配使用,但可以和attend, have, sit for
,conduct, enter for, get through, pass, fail等词语用在一起。
3、用词累赘
由于对某些词和词组的意思缺乏真正的理解或把要表达的意思先用中文想好,然后逐字翻译成英语,造成累赘。例如:
① (误)In my opinion, I think t he production and sale of fake commodities should be
banned.
(正)I think t he production and sale of fake commodities should be banned.
in my opinion与I think意思完全相同,可以删去其中的一个。
② (误)Scientists are trying to find a solution to solve t he problem of energy shortage .
(正)Scientist s are trying to find a solution to t he problem of energy shortage.
一个词与它的派生词一起出现,造成意思重复,给人以累赘的感觉,改正后的句子变得简洁多了。
③ (误)Waste gas is t he main cause which leads to air pollution .
(正)Waste gas is t he main cause of air pollution.
cause和lead to都表原因,同时使用造成意思重复。
4、逗号连接错误。
中国学生在英语写作中常常单独使用逗号而不用句号、分号、冒号或连结词来连接两个或几个独立的分句。例如:
① (误)The weather was fine, we decided to climb t he mountain.
(正)As the weather was fine, we decided to climb t he mountain.
② (误)The [wv]prospects[/vw] are bright, the road has twists and turns.
(正)While t he prospects are bright, the road has twists and turns.
上面两个标有误的句子在语法上没有错误,它错就错在逗号的使用不当。错误的根源是学生受汉语写作习惯的影响,把汉语逗号的作用等同于英语逗号的作用。在汉语中,逗号可以单独使用在并列分句之间。
(1)变成两个简单句:
The wind was blow ing very hard. They couldn’t go boating on t he lake.
(2)变成并列句,用逗号加并列连接:
The wind was blowing very hard they couldn’t go boating on t he lake.
(3)变成并列句,用分号连接:
The wind was blowing very hard; couldn’t go boating on t he lake.
(4)变成并列句,用分号加连接性副连接:
The wind was blowing very hard ,therefore, they couldn’t go boating on lake.
(5)变成并列句,有时也可以用冒接,这时第二个分句解释说明第一个分句
They couldn’t go boating on the lake; the wind was blowing very hard.
(6)变成复合句:
As the wind was blowing very hard they couldn’t go boating on t he lake.
(7)用独立主格结构改写句子:
The wind blowing very hard, they couldn’t go boating on t he lake.
如果大家在词汇和语法有一定累积的基础上，再避免出现中式英语的东西，加上观点的正确性，我想那些基础差的考生想拿到写作六分，应该可以如愿以偿的。最后祝愿大家在新的一年里，能够顺利通过雅思考试，拿到心中的分数。
英语写作
篇7：GMAT写作5.5分作文
GMAT写作5.5分作文模板
In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.
In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that . However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that .. It is likely that , it is also likely that Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that Therefore, this argument in question nee not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnot necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.
★ GRE写作金句
GRE写作5.5分经验（精选7篇）
